Six stacks, six reviews
Each use case restarting the architecture and security argument from zero, taking as long as the first one did.
The layer stack that lets many teams ship AI without each one re-solving architecture, security, and operations.
A platform is what replaces six teams building six stacks. Its value is not any single layer — it is that governance, identity, and observability become properties of the substrate rather than things each team is asked to remember.
The layers below are ordered by how expensive they are to change. Infrastructure decisions outlive application ones by years, which is why they are made first and deliberately.
GPU compute, Kubernetes or OpenShift, storage for models and indexes, and the network isolation your security position depends on. Hardest to change later.
Model serving with autoscaling, continuous batching, and quantization where it pays. Scale-to-zero matters more than peak throughput for most enterprise workloads.
The control point. Authentication, model routing, rate limiting, guardrails, cost attribution, and audit logging — applied once, for everyone.
Ingestion, indexing, and entitlement-aware retrieval offered as a service. Each team building its own means each team writing its own permission bugs.
Product team code, built on SDKs and templates. Teams should be writing product logic, not inference plumbing.
Inventory, risk classification, approval workflow, evaluation standards, and audit evidence. Spans every layer, which is why it works.
| Decision | What we do, and why |
|---|---|
| Gateway as the control point | One place for policy, cost, and audit. The alternative is trusting six teams to each implement it identically, which does not happen. |
| Paved paths, not gates | Make the secure route the easy route. A platform that only blocks gets routed around, and shadow AI is worse than governed AI. |
| Retrieval as a service | Centralizing it concentrates the hardest correctness problem — entitlements — in one reviewed implementation. |
| Run on existing Kubernetes | AI becomes a workload on infrastructure you already operate, rather than a parallel stack with its own on-call rotation. |
| Cost attribution from day one | Retrofitting per-team attribution is painful. Without it, nobody owns spend and nobody can justify the platform. |
Each use case restarting the architecture and security argument from zero, taking as long as the first one did.
AI spend growing with nobody able to say which workflow drives it or whether it returns value.
Safety and policy controls applied well by one team and forgotten by another.
Teams routing around a platform that only says no, ending up with less governance than before it existed.
The assessment produces a reference architecture scoped to your data, infrastructure, and regulatory position — not a generic diagram.
Vendor-neutral. We hold no reseller agreements and take no vendor commissions.